Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law

Be warned that this article is about to bitch slap the academic community and I might very well be condemned to a lifetime any number of nasty adjectives by lesser minds whose masturbation of intellect has convinced themselves that they are going anywhere but sidewalk philosophy.

Let me warn you right from paragraph one I am about to state something controversial. Oh my, I feel my Pluto in twenty four degrees of Leo this morning about to arise and make a ghost of all my rivals. Stop reading this article right here if you are a weak fool or possess a flat earth moron mentality.

Stating that life is defined as a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution only proclaims a summary of our species, the human being and it does not move toward an explanation on how life might exist elsewhere. We observe such a definition and even the most complex proportion equations cannot have any basis in reality until they become really useful when something else in the universe has attained an evolution that we can define as an intelligent life form. As an amusing diversion decades ago I once created equations of an earth like planet three times the size of earth could have humans three times the size of humans here on planet earth. “How scientifically Giants can exist” although amusing, proved nothing but one of my methods to make math more interesting. What is really important is how or can we evolve from human being to a higher life form noting that the way we arrived where we are does not exist as a consequence of ecological compromises. I pointed out to others that no real solution has been presented nor has the problem been emphasized anywhere. Genetic engineering? How do you know what to strive for or concentrate on when you cannot know what the next level of evolution will be? The only solution that fills in the spaces of the missing product of the X question is the Law of Θελημα.

My lecture has been to observe volition, the True Self, the True Will and the path of life making any number of suggestions for the reformulation of the educational process. Instead of listening to me, I was told that no way exists to scientifically observe classroom parallels which shows you those types of mentality who give moron excuses instead of working out a plan where we can find a byway.

Science has discovered that the Neanderthal existed for 300,000 years prior their extinction. Our species, the homo sapiens then continued with its unique evolution, skills, talents and self awareness. The Neanderthal lost the human race to the homo sapiens and their finish line was the “Darwin Award” of extinction. I don’t mean to worry anyone but we, the homo sapiens are now at 300,000 years of known existence according to archaeologists. I can only present the possibility that such another evolutionary event is possible based on the data of the past and attempt to encourage research where the very real existence of initiation has to be studied in absolute ratio to our evolutionary process. Those involved with astrophysics rattle on with regards to what we have discovered with the space telescopes which is all well and good with progress in that field. I do enjoy their lectures. So do we concentrate on the inner universe of humanity and a scientific study of evolution and initiation with the same vigor? Why, of course we don’t! If anything, funds are denied for the Rhine ESP Cards, parapsychologists and other research that seems to be too racy for the blood of conservative academics. Hmmm, very suspicious. Watch those academics closely whether they are gathering thesis from a historical perspective or using the method of science. I tried to point out the type of academic that writes about occultism where they do not practice it and naturally I was misunderstood. I continued my objections writing about what is significant history to back up my objections to their poopstick IQ approach. What we need is scientists and the method of science to tackle the real issue of evolution and initiation. Not some slimy PHD who doesn’t know the first thing about setting up real laboratories.

All these issues have been more important than anything else where if we are to learn of the natural evolution wave of our past we can deduce the progress of evolution scientifically to know what needs to be our Next Step. We must understand what we really are. I do not know how the present generation of scientists observe this but I have presented the concept that evolution and initiation might be identical from the perspective of gaining control of more than one plane of existence. Depending on who you are and your educational background this might either be a shocking notion from a mad scientist, a possibility, or the ravings of an evil sorcerer maneuvering for power. Well, what if I am right? Can’t answer that, can you? It is otherwise imperative that we observe such a controversial presentation free from emotional connotation. After all, to state that the highest initiations are identical with the highest level of evolution that a human is capable of does bitch slap the academic community into a state of steadfast alert on such a statement that they cannot prove but “sounds” like it might have possibility.

Yet, our concern is humanity and without natural selection science has not as yet observed anything else or any other direction toward intelligent life. Moreover, the official scientific attempt to explain us only scratches the surface of what we are and what we are capable of. After all, we are capable of a level of abstraction that defies explanation and especially if you study comparative metaphysics. If anything, every alien from outer space in every science fiction, monster or otherwise, exists as a part of our self where without experiencing anything what we have become we cannot create even in our wildest imaginations an alien intelligence that is not directly affiliated with subconscious or conscious tendency.

Now that I’ve bitched slapped the academic community, let's take a baseball bat to the hypocrisy of the Darwinist. We must observe with no little controversy that the Darwinists have been known to be hypocrites where they submit to family religion rather than take a stand and develop any form of philosophy from their so-called path of life. What is a Darwinist doing going to Church or Synagogue? They are moving in compliance with their wives, husbands or lovers who insist upon it and naturally they take modern vaccines rather than let themselves die as unfit in our strain of evolution where they would not have the stomach to initiate natural selection. Such observations on my part over the years have led to me find a way to exist where although I admire Charles Darwin and his thesis intensely only the Law of Θελημα has ever given me anything that remotely covers the possibility of evolution free from such a parallel of hypocrisy. If you observe the Darwinist they cannot really apply natural selection without being accused of cruel and sadistic behavior unbecoming to the civilized demeanor. After all, wouldn’t they have to object to those naive bio chemists or goody goody Professors of Immunology whose research and development of vaccines that allow the weak to live where no natural immunity would be the signature of the experiment? Will a great genius come along and give us a very real philosophy that can be applied to the path of life for a Darwinist? My observation is this has already occurred and with the Law of Θελημα they can end the long years of hypocrisy and embrace a path where their acknowledgment of natural selection is at last openly discussed without their persistent contradictions of life. Without the vaccines millions of people die like dogs which is the negative side of what occurs. With the next generation that survives they are naturally immune. Yet those scientists who develop the vaccines are not necessarily doing humanity’s future any good which is something I bring up for the possibility of a civilized solution. Such a solution has not been brought up. After all, the Darwinist takes the vaccine and everyone wants to preserve their lives to live as long as they possibly can. In 1721 e.v. smallpox in Boston wiped out eight percent of the population. The concept of the “immune system” simply wasn’t a part of science during that era. Edward Jenner we all were once taught in the classroom was the greatest genius of all time who saved millions of lives and ended the horrors of smallpox which supposed to of been eradicated by 1979 e.v.. Clearly, he is to be admired for his contribution. Nevertheless, the weak live and from the perspective of the Darwinist the weak need to die to assure natural immunity exists for future generations. This entire issue is rarely discussed and of course, no matter how friendly I am to the Darwinist they really have nothing in the manner of how to view life sanely without hypocrisy. I present the dilemma of the Darwinist the only solution for this by introducing them to the Law of Θελημα.

Why yes, now that I’ve taken those two children to the woodshed we have covered how important it is to finally study the concept of initiation and evolution for we human beings as an intelligent life form.

For those who would have an interest in such a direction my suggestion is to what is written after Liber V of the impression of ideas from the ceremony which begins,
“(Here followeth an impression of the ideas implied in this Pæan)”
Rather than quote what He wrote after the italics I sincerely recommend those who are new to the Law of Θελημα read this carefully.

I do realize that with no little puzzlement someone might observe that talent anyone can possess but genius is another matter entirely where no one can anticipate its existence with any accuracy. After all, look at the influence of John Napier who went away to Europe a nobody returning to Scotland introducing decimal arithmetic and logarithms which led to modern western technologies or other researchers searching for one thing to discover something more important than what was striven for in the laboratory. For those who would study the apparent coincidence where a nobody goes away and mysteriously comes back a somebody where we are rarely have details or accurate records on what transpired with what occurred I absolutely recommend a careful study of Book Four, Part I. Clearly, John Napier was one of the greatest geniuses in the history of Scotland yet no one knows what really happened to him when he went away to Europe.

So therefore, if we are to make sense about evolution we must know what we, as human beings are and if we are to make sense of initiation we follow the parallels of those whose genius has already given us data.

Love is the law, love under will