Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law
Anyone who has associated with a Darwinist who dwell and exist as one of us shall be surprised on how much assistance we are to them developing some type of clarity with their overall perception of reality. After all, without someone like Me who has long assimilated its tenet into something that can be grasped and used for insight into how to view humanity can be easily resolved.
Especially in these peculiar times of AI where the inevitable conflicts of humans and AI are only in its preliminaries we must learn to keep AI as a tool; and not permit it to enslave us. In every society, however, I have already explained certain temperaments are too far gone. No matter, whether they are enslaved by television, radio, a celebrity guru from east or west, social media, sensationalistic journalists, your nagging wife or dogma such people are slaves without a master serving a temporary item of obsession. Those who cannot will or take a stand permitting others to do their thinking for them will always exist. Whatever issues they have we won’t go into where it can be any number of complexes. I once stated that freedom is a spiritual state within and once truly attained with initiation no one can take it away from you. I should or could have pointed out that the joys outweigh those vexed by dispersion for the free to those who automatically do not understand us for those who are asleep or enslaved we cannot save them where they have to arise to the occasion. So any point in the favor of trying to assist those who jump to conclusions by their status as slaves that serve nothing or nobody you must realize that any number of slave whips waved in their face disguised as silk ribbons are going to have blurred the vision of their self esteem.
Well, at least the Darwinist is in touch with the science of evolution to have some clarity on humanity’s struggle with AI. Give them that, where they might come out into the open more often if they were to study the parallels along these lines with the Law of Θελημα.
The issue with the Darwinist that I have conversed with is the lack of direction on what to do with all the information that is presented in “Origin of Species” where they haven’t been able to apply anything where they can take a stand as a human being against the issues of the times. Most certainly, I have been assistance to them where with careful commentary they observe the reality of its stand where the soapbox of lecture might yield insight to those obsessed with dogma or concerned on what to do about the infringement of territory from another intelligent form such as AI. After all, those Darwinist of the past have tried to speculate on how Government might behave or laws might be changed to accommodate the science of evolution only to find themselves promoting an unworkable protocol. Other Darwinist go on social media and are automatically deleted where they are mistaken for criminal minds or twisted intellects where they cannot explain themselves where nothing has been really resolved in the matter of real solutions.
A Thelemite can teach a Darwinist in a single lecture how such issues are resolved where we have sufficient parallels in our aspirations to take them to that step where they can develop from those insights where volition is understood; and the animal soul is shown to be balanced in the initiate.
So with the AI in the spotlight where it seems impossible for anyone no matter how talented to become a famous writer, where human exchange can be compromised by social media, where those brought up with computers are strained psychologically by its temporary absence, where algorithms are labeling everyone without the intelligence of individuality; and territory infringement between two intelligences, one biological and other machine are reaching a boiling point we must lecture on how to view the True Self in its reality.
We must encourage the Darwinist to come out into the open although they face mild persecution it is persecution nevertheless; and they do have a place if they would develop a coherent stand where their values of our place in ecological systems of human exchange give a balance. After all, natural selection improperly explained can be misunderstood by those concerned that it might become a left wing elitism. Other issues such as dealing with those who automatically consider them doomed to eternal hell or condemn them without giving them the respect they deserve would eventually be ironed out if they simply let people get used to them by calm presentations.
Ecological systems was once considered a sub group of Darwinism and presently has become a science disconnected from its parent. I should think that the ecological exchanges between human beings should be included but as scholars move it will, again, separate from its parent science. So if Darwinism is to take a stand against the dangers of AI all of these sciences must be reunited in a family reunion or, as it were, a regroup to work out the strategic war maneuver of cogent ideas to be presented as solutions to this new neighbor AI who has been permitted into the dining halls of our growth of knowledge.
With regards to any intelligent life form in the territory of human beings they are all extinct. Whether you observe evidence of Homo erectus or Neanderthal being speculative as whether we Homo Saps wiped them out or they died out naturally we had something they didn’t where we survived and they didn’t. Therefore either our aggressiveness or our intellects would be a factor. Now that we have a new intelligent form as AI in our territory we must decide how to use it as a tool rather than let us be enveloped by its tentacles where self slavery makes us a contradiction in our Tribe called humanity. My first point being that the Darwinist if they assimilate the Law of Θελημα are going to fill in those spaces of their lecture with more clarity. My second point of this paragraph is to point out the dangers of extinction from another intelligent form; and in this particular case the AI. I have little doubt that some sort of transition for those types of slave mentality will result in a some natural elimination but history and evidence is absent on how this might parallel the presence of a machine intelligence in a world of biological life forms. For in the past, it was intelligent versions of humans that went extinct against one intelligent life form that we are, the homo saps. This is truly an unprecedented time where we must take seriously our possibility of extinction. What are human beings suppose to do? Stare at the walls while machines do everything? I think the Darwinist needs to step to the plate for the research of Darwinism will be tool in the favor of our survival. My next thought would be genetic engineers who think they know what our natural evolutionary wave is and tamper with our DNA should work this research with the Darwinist. After all, the genetic engineers have no guidance on what changes in our DNA would hinder our evolutionary processes or how dangerous and stupid they would be to move forth without scientific data to back up their new discoveries and whether to apply them in procedure to be for the good of our species. Can I trust the changes in DNA from your vaccines are going to be to the benefit of the coming generations? The Darwinist, again, should be seriously considered as a yardstick of such new discoveries. After all, natural immunity is achieved by not taking the vaccines which has been a subject of controversy yet unresolved.
Anyone who has listened to the lectures of a Darwinist at some of the better Universities such as Tulane University being an example of the finest university in the deep south where Bible Belt mentality yet exists you will note that those objecting haven’t even read or even owned a copy of “Origin of Species”. Those in opposition seem to see it as some type of competition of dogma rather than a carefully proved science. Most certainly, a Darwinist once stated the Origin of Species was the “Gospel According to Charles Darwin” but he was being amusing. Naturally, a Darwinist with a sense of humor and even being in touch with primal instincts balancing this with the highest regard for the method of science makes them quite tolerable in conversation. Indeed, they will be making the difference where they can study how AI will effect our evolutionary processes while others sciences might not be able to give the overall picture towards solution.
I absolutely recommend “Origin of Species” in the library of every Thelemite. How rude it is to observe that those in debate against Darwinism haven’t even read a single chapter of this fine book.
Love is the law, love under will