Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law
Greetings to those attending this lecture on this somewhat cloudy day where I observe that the royal family is conspicuously absent from a petitioned seat where they no longer consider themselves important enough to associate with our sublime level of insight. How curious, this issue of True Elites, and the entire class of people labeled the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie. The issue shall be important, at least, to Thelemites who will have to gain perspective on how mystical imperialism has bearing and necessity where it is emphasized in our Holy of Holiness of Text. Shall we immediately demand that the difference between old Aeon royalty and New Aeon Royalty be brought to the attention of the Thelemite where these meditations might avoid those errors of the past of aristocracy. We shall define bourgeoisie in its clarified definition as a social order dominated by capitalists where they are not middle class but neither are they a member of any royal court. So, they are a royalty within themselves or at least from the perspective of their own merit that has proven themselves through their own effort and will. This would be a far more Thelemic concept of royalty than the old Aeon rigmarole of generations of fat cats. A warehouse worker on the same level as a “real” Prince?? Well, it looks like I’ve some explaining to do.
Ah yes, shall we contemplate momentarily about the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie? Such diabolical contemplations do have a tendency, when shared, clearly erupt some frustrated rebuttal. No matter, what I shall impart with this has been a long time coming, don’t you think? Where the very spirit of the True Self can conjure easily a energy above these self centered delusions passing themselves off for upper middle class where the attitude or lifestyle does not necessarily mean the True Self but simply the privilege and advantage of their wealth making a show where if faced with ordeal are often floored where the initiate who has awakened True Will with the fire thrust of True Will meets all tests of their mettle with courage and raw determination. A beggar cannot hide his poverty no matter how much wealth he brandishes where if he is truly strong he shall be a king that chooses his garment as he will.
Ah yes, shall we contemplate the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie. Mystical imperialism is a subject I have covered and its magical links have to be emphasized by observing its history from those observations where we can define the truth of true elites. I present this issue of false elites and true elites to this soapbox knowing that the New Aeon presents solutions that do not insult the intelligence of those whose True Self, unfolded, realize that merit is vital; and the royal family must be ever ready to bring new blood into its circle. What of the old Aeon King, you might inquire? Observing him, he dresses in a style that tries to inspire his royal court and subjects to a greater sense of dignity. He follows those noble traditions of his family; and rules with such persistent nobility that we might overlook his callous class caste attitude that annoys those to whom he calls “peasant”, “commoner” and other names that might without strict leadership result in a revolution against his rule. He tries to be a representative of the best that can possibly be and an example of esteem by his dress and mannerism. Proud and haughty he sits upon his Throne relishes in his power where for generations his Family has been a sublime symbol of royal blood. What could possibly go wrong? His family has held power for so long it is unthinkable that any transition to any other perceptions of aristocracy might replace his stiff upper lip on the overall perceptions of such generations long persistence.
Oh my, shall we observe those errors of the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie? If we are to study what could possibly go wrong to come to definite observations we observe what did go wrong for example to clarify our position. For three hundred years Russia had the Czar; and yet its people arose in revolution against its own royal family. Can you contemplate on such a length of time where to understand what went wrong shall assist us to clarify what to do not to reiterate such an earthquake that destroyed an entire royal court? After all, their tradition seemed no worse than other nations where aristocracy did not die. To increase our dismay on such an observation of history the entire new government deteriorated into communism where instead of “peasants” they seemed to have become enslaved by a worse dictatorship than anything the Czar presented to them on his Throne. In three hundred years they could not learn to hold power? This is clearly madness; and to learn what not to do shall learn what to do. In addition, we do not define bourgeoisie like the commie Karl Marx but the more sensible commentary and definition by those noble French where the man on the street is the man to meet.
As history shouts at us in its paragraphs, shall we observe without overmuch rationalization the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie? In addition, we have the United States of America once a colony of England whose document shows us something called the “Declaration of Independence” where they arose against the King where the entire colony twisted the relationship of Government where they proclaimed Government to be a servant of the people where the very freedom that this created with social evolution rather than extremist revolution resulted in a Government where it was possible for the farmer to become President or even the ice cream boy to become a Senator. What went right with this; and what went wrong with that? Clearly, past historians cannot be giving us the truth of its cause and effect; and nothing they speculate on has panned out to any reality that assists our understanding on how to remedy such a disease of deteriorated royal court; or the success of those who rejected the royals where they calling us commoners or knaves we called them false elites. Perceiving the USA observing its financial growth without a proper study of the Declaration of Independence from the false elites is to twist what became the American Dream into a history that ignores the fundamental value of social evolution and how a new Government which excluded the issues of aristocracy from its previous formats is to lose the lessons of how to perceive mystical aristocracy from Our perspective.
Oh Oh, shall we meditate on new lessons of folklore where we have learned to adjust the audacity of the bourgeoisie of the bourgeoisie? Without a doubt, we all enjoy that folklore where Kings and Queens are ever majestic in their theatrical idiosyncrasies. Yet, new tales should be told where what we try to label the common man has arisen in his private glory where wealth within; and royal vigor is attained throughout enlightenment and self esteem from very real experiences and adventures. Can I not be as good a Gardener as a king can be a king? Shall it not transpire with initiation that as the centre of my circle I shall rule in my own way that tailor shop, that factory, that spacecraft shop, that culinary establishment, that assembly line, that fashion designer, that real estate agent, that health official, or any other line of skill that I have chosen for myself that meets the merit of my True Will? If freedom is a spiritual state within and I have achieved consistent satisfaction of my adventures where they as learning experiences have brought me to a glory to be more than a rival for those other kings who are publicly acknowledged. Do I not ride with equal vigor and determination the great horse of triumph to the sunset of glorious pride of self? Alas, how arrogant this might appear to the pompous aristocrat who observes wealth, power and family status from his perspective where the errors of the caste system mingle in the corridors of his dead-end, and old Aeon perspective. After all, he can observe himself as the centre of all but to permit others who he cannot categorize as equal will not be viewed with equal status or merit. Yet, from our perspective Every man and every woman is a star moving forth toward an end or purpose whose True Will shall not be pinpointed by a mere paragraph.
For going in itself is an ever moving forth where that mountain when reached is only a stepping stone to the stars of infinite possibility.
Love is the law, love under will